Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Week 8 June 29

It doesn't matter if you are in church, school, a conference or just visiting over lunch, if you can link new information to a story or some set of interesting knowledge to the listener I think you will have success. Learning takes place when new knowledge has character to back it up. It is always more fun for the learner to have some sort of interest invested into the learning.
As trainers/teachers we need to keep this in mind when presenting new information. While we may find that what we say is extremely important, the learner doesn't see it that way unless you have reeled them in with some sort of clincher.

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Week 7 June 22



Learning using Intrinsic motivation is important, but I think that sometimes as a teacher you need to be sneaky in order for it to be intrinsic for the learner to want to participate. Now that it is summer I have decided that it is time to potty train X, our 2 year old boy. I don't care what any book tells you about potty training, a kid is going to figure it out when he is intrinsically motivated. You can use all of the extrinsic motivation you want with some success, but ultimately they need to see the value in using the restroom before they will commit to the process. I have been lucky so far, because it is apparent that he is ready for the change. He wants to be big like his brothers and not go the bathroom in his pants. Sure he has had some accidents, but he is moving in the right direction with the right motivation.
As teachers, we need to take a more active roll in finding the intrinsic route. I think sometimes too often we rely on the extrinsic motivation techniques because they get instant results, but like Malone discussed, once it is gone they will not see a need to do it again.
I think we also forget that all students don't think our subject matter is as cool or interesting as we think it is. In order to grab their interest we need to teach to their level and understand their perceptions of the subject.

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Week 6 June 15


As a mother of 6, I have children that fall in each of the 4 stages of development that Piaget distinguishes between. Xaviah, or just X is our 2 year old that has been as of late in the sensory-motor stage, but has rapidly moved into pre-operational representation. He is learning so rapidly and is reformatting all that he learned in the previous stage. Walker and Hayden are currently in the concrete operations stage of development. I watch them focus their learning on ordering and love simple math that is definitive. Nick and Gabe are twins and Kylie is just a year older. All three of them have recently moved into hypothetic deductive operations stage. With Nick and Gabe being 11 they are just figuring out some abstract math and continually ask me to come up with algebric equations to ask them. Kylie has been in this stage for a couple of years now and she uses a lot of deductive reasoning in her attempt to learn new information.
Looking at my kids and studying Piaget this week I define learning depends upon the four factors that Piaget says explain development which are Maturation, experience, social transmission, and equilibrium.
As teacher/trainers we can encourage and support learning by understanding the different developmental stages and consider the learners from this vantage point to better fit their needs and increase understanding and retention.

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Week 5 June 8

WOW!!!! My mind is racing with ideas about learning this week. I am currently at a Professional Learning Communities conference in Las Vegas, Nevada and I am being hit left and right with ideas about learning.
My ideas on learning today is that learning needs to be the fundamental purpose of our schools and with that purpose we as educators need to be willing to look at ALL teaching practices and determine their impact on learning. In order to accomplish this giant task we need to be willing to cultivate a collaborative culture through same level, same course effective teams. These teams can then assess current effectiveness on the basis of results rather than intentions and move toward continuous improvement.
I have learned at this conference that there needs to be a shift of focus from teacher/teaching to learner/learning. If teachers, teams and schools can begin to make this shift they will see good things happen.
Any comments????

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

Week 4 June 1

This week I have had to step up to the plate regarding using technology to help learners. Our district has decided, due to budget cuts, that more training for teachers needs to be done online. So me, along with others, have had the task of transferring once face to face trainings into online trainings. Since I have had a great deal of experience with online training this seemed like a task that would take time, but would be easy to transfer the information to an online version. The other members of my cohort have not had any experience with online learning and have had a hard time with giving up some of the face to face elaboration of material that comes with this type of training. I have had to be very patient with them regarding this online learning mind frame.
With this in mind my definition of learning this week is generational. Learning, in my opinion, generally takes place differently depending upon the generation of the learner.
Here is some information I got about Generational differences from a book called "Generations At Work" (Zemke, Raines, Filipczak 2000).
The Veterans: They like consistency and uniformity. They are very disciplined, learn through
logic, and are hard working.
The Baby Boomers: Through Education they learned about teamwork. May put process ahead of result. Many struggle with technology, but thrive on learning.
The Gen Xers: balance work and play. Technologically they are savy. Adaptable yet impatient. Learned from diverse viewpoints, and encouraged to disagree and debate issues.
The Nexters: They have street smarts. Technological sophistication and positive expectations. They learn best in teams under the influence of a strong central authority figure.
In light of some of these generational differences, I think that in order to be an effective teacher there is a need to study the generational styles. Even faculties have issues that seem to be generational based. More learning could probably take place if we as teacher/trainers new more about these differences.
Something to think about!!!!!